<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Te Waka o PascalTe Waka o Pascal &#187; </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog</link>
	<description>Keeping Pascal afloat in Aotearoa</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:33:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Delphi for iOS Kick Start &#8211; Sorry, It Isn&#8217;t Here by Mick</title>
		<link>http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog/?p=1430&#038;cpage=1#comment-14102</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog/?p=1430#comment-14102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m curious to hear your thoughts on Rem Objects&#039; Oxygene for Cocoa, once you try it out. 

After realizing that FireMonkey on iOS won&#039;t pick up the new iOS 7 look automatically (bc FM doesn&#039;t use native visual controls), I&#039;ve been looking at Xamarin Studio (using C#) and their GUI designer which *does* use native controls. Unlike Oxygene for Cocoa, Xamarin Studio has its own integrated GUI designer (like VS and Delphi on Win32).

However, it&#039;s still in alpha.
http://docs.xamarin.com/guides/ios/user_interface/designer

Worst case scenario (which isn&#039;t bad) is that I&#039;ll use XCode and Obj-C. It&#039;s really a nice language, but XCode is such a departure from Delphi and Visual Studio&#039;s GUI development...and I just prefer Delphi. Unfortunately, Delphi has moved their visual controls away from native implementations...and it has me looking elsewhere these days. Maybe they&#039;ll buy/incorporate TMS iCL and I&#039;ll take another look at Delphi on iOS.

http://www.tmssoftware.com/site/tmsicl.asp]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious to hear your thoughts on Rem Objects&#8217; Oxygene for Cocoa, once you try it out. </p>
<p>After realizing that FireMonkey on iOS won&#8217;t pick up the new iOS 7 look automatically (bc FM doesn&#8217;t use native visual controls), I&#8217;ve been looking at Xamarin Studio (using C#) and their GUI designer which *does* use native controls. Unlike Oxygene for Cocoa, Xamarin Studio has its own integrated GUI designer (like VS and Delphi on Win32).</p>
<p>However, it&#8217;s still in alpha.<br />
<a href="http://docs.xamarin.com/guides/ios/user_interface/designer" rel="nofollow">http://docs.xamarin.com/guides/ios/user_interface/designer</a></p>
<p>Worst case scenario (which isn&#8217;t bad) is that I&#8217;ll use XCode and Obj-C. It&#8217;s really a nice language, but XCode is such a departure from Delphi and Visual Studio&#8217;s GUI development&#8230;and I just prefer Delphi. Unfortunately, Delphi has moved their visual controls away from native implementations&#8230;and it has me looking elsewhere these days. Maybe they&#8217;ll buy/incorporate TMS iCL and I&#8217;ll take another look at Delphi on iOS.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tmssoftware.com/site/tmsicl.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.tmssoftware.com/site/tmsicl.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Delphi for iOS Kick Start &#8211; Sorry, It Isn&#8217;t Here by jpluimers</title>
		<link>http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog/?p=1430&#038;cpage=1#comment-14101</link>
		<dc:creator>jpluimers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog/?p=1430#comment-14101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Had a similar thing myself. Changed the title of a blog post after DelphiFeeds picked it up. 

Seems DelphiFeeds does not update itself from changes RSS (:]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had a similar thing myself. Changed the title of a blog post after DelphiFeeds picked it up. </p>
<p>Seems DelphiFeeds does not update itself from changes RSS (:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Delphi for iOS Kick Start &#8211; Sorry, It Isn&#8217;t Here by Deltics</title>
		<link>http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog/?p=1430&#038;cpage=1#comment-14100</link>
		<dc:creator>Deltics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog/?p=1430#comment-14100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for that, :) although I guess this means that nothing is ever going to appear at the URL previously submitted to/picked up by the Delphi Feeds aggregator.  Oops.  :(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that, <img src='http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  although I guess this means that nothing is ever going to appear at the URL previously submitted to/picked up by the Delphi Feeds aggregator.  Oops.  <img src='http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Delphi for iOS Kick Start &#8211; Sorry, It Isn&#8217;t Here by Bruce McGee</title>
		<link>http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog/?p=1430&#038;cpage=1#comment-14099</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce McGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog/?p=1430#comment-14099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://blogs.embarcadero.com/stephenball/2013/06/18/delphi-programming-kick-start-ios/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.embarcadero.com/stephenball/2013/06/18/delphi-programming-kick-start-ios/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/stephenball/2013/06/18/delphi-programming-kick-start-ios/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iOS &#8220;Support&#8221; Prior to XE4 ? by RichardS</title>
		<link>http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog/?p=1403&#038;cpage=1#comment-14056</link>
		<dc:creator>RichardS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 11:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog/?p=1403#comment-14056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very well expressed David - captures my own feelings almost exactly.

The cost of Delphi is trivial compared to other costs in my small business. 

XE2 was over-hyped in the marketing but most people knew pretty quickly the FM/iOS additions were of little more than alpha quality. 

I&#039;m really quite narked about how they handled XE3, which will surely go down as one of the least used versions in recent history. I mean - why would anybody upgrade to it? It&#039;s buggier than its predecessors, has no new features of any real value (Metropolis! Yay!) and produces more bloated and slower exes.

XE4 should have been XE3.5, as they strongly implied it would be. But they do need the money badly, it seems. Which worries more than a lot of other things do.

Delphi quality has always been variable, unfortunately. I think we&#039;re quite fortunate that in recent years we&#039;ve had two, arguably three pretty solid releases for Windows work (D2010, XE, XE2) with continual and very worthwhile improvements. XE3 dipped down in quality and new features Let&#039;s hope XE4 represents a dip up.

Richard]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well expressed David &#8211; captures my own feelings almost exactly.</p>
<p>The cost of Delphi is trivial compared to other costs in my small business. </p>
<p>XE2 was over-hyped in the marketing but most people knew pretty quickly the FM/iOS additions were of little more than alpha quality. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m really quite narked about how they handled XE3, which will surely go down as one of the least used versions in recent history. I mean &#8211; why would anybody upgrade to it? It&#8217;s buggier than its predecessors, has no new features of any real value (Metropolis! Yay!) and produces more bloated and slower exes.</p>
<p>XE4 should have been XE3.5, as they strongly implied it would be. But they do need the money badly, it seems. Which worries more than a lot of other things do.</p>
<p>Delphi quality has always been variable, unfortunately. I think we&#8217;re quite fortunate that in recent years we&#8217;ve had two, arguably three pretty solid releases for Windows work (D2010, XE, XE2) with continual and very worthwhile improvements. XE3 dipped down in quality and new features Let&#8217;s hope XE4 represents a dip up.</p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Qualified Enum Reference That Fails to Compile in XE4 (and rightly so) by Gunni</title>
		<link>http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog/?p=1397&#038;cpage=1#comment-14053</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 12:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog/?p=1397#comment-14053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When copying unit  &quot;Foo.Foo.pas&quot; to &quot;Foo.Fx.pas&quot; and to &quot;Fy.Foo.pas&quot; then the following DPR will compile in D7:

program unused;
uses
  Foo.Fx in &#039;Foo.Fx.pas&#039;;
var
  c: Integer;
begin
  c := Ord(Foo.enumBAR);
end.

and the following DPR will NOT compile in D7:

program unused;
uses
  Fy.Foo in &#039;Fy.Foo.pas&#039;;
var
  c: Integer;
begin
  c := Ord(Foo.enumBAR);
end.

So getting dotty with unit names seems to be a bad idea in Delphi versions lower than XE4]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When copying unit  &#8220;Foo.Foo.pas&#8221; to &#8220;Foo.Fx.pas&#8221; and to &#8220;Fy.Foo.pas&#8221; then the following DPR will compile in D7:</p>
<p>program unused;<br />
uses<br />
  Foo.Fx in &#8216;Foo.Fx.pas&#8217;;<br />
var<br />
  c: Integer;<br />
begin<br />
  c := Ord(Foo.enumBAR);<br />
end.</p>
<p>and the following DPR will NOT compile in D7:</p>
<p>program unused;<br />
uses<br />
  Fy.Foo in &#8216;Fy.Foo.pas&#8217;;<br />
var<br />
  c: Integer;<br />
begin<br />
  c := Ord(Foo.enumBAR);<br />
end.</p>
<p>So getting dotty with unit names seems to be a bad idea in Delphi versions lower than XE4</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Changing Your Delphi License Serial Number by wouter</title>
		<link>http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog/?p=1425&#038;cpage=1#comment-14052</link>
		<dc:creator>wouter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 08:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog/?p=1425#comment-14052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a problem that only legal users might face. The torrent edition fixes this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a problem that only legal users might face. The torrent edition fixes this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Changing Your Delphi License Serial Number by cl</title>
		<link>http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog/?p=1425&#038;cpage=1#comment-14049</link>
		<dc:creator>cl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 22:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog/?p=1425#comment-14049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am using Lazarus v3.10 on Ubuntu 12.04, (Code Typhon distribution), works great. I left Delphi at version 6, so cannot comment on the starting speed. One of the item that bothered me in earlier versions of Lazarus versions F12 toggling problem, now it is fixed. The docking of the windows worked great too, IMHO, much better than D6.  I am not familiar with the facilities of the latest Delphi, guess some of us may require to stay Delphi because of the new features, or it may be a corporate decision?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am using Lazarus v3.10 on Ubuntu 12.04, (Code Typhon distribution), works great. I left Delphi at version 6, so cannot comment on the starting speed. One of the item that bothered me in earlier versions of Lazarus versions F12 toggling problem, now it is fixed. The docking of the windows worked great too, IMHO, much better than D6.  I am not familiar with the facilities of the latest Delphi, guess some of us may require to stay Delphi because of the new features, or it may be a corporate decision?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Changing Your Delphi License Serial Number by Deltics</title>
		<link>http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog/?p=1425&#038;cpage=1#comment-14048</link>
		<dc:creator>Deltics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 03:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog/?p=1425#comment-14048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s never been any problem with different versions of Delphi installed.   At one point I had a &quot;museum&quot; VM with EVERY version of Delphi from 1.0 to 2009.  :) 

Problems with the licensing system on the other hand have only gotten worse over the years since the introduction of activation.   This particular one probably existed before but this was the first time it bit me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s never been any problem with different versions of Delphi installed.   At one point I had a &#8220;museum&#8221; VM with EVERY version of Delphi from 1.0 to 2009.  <img src='http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Problems with the licensing system on the other hand have only gotten worse over the years since the introduction of activation.   This particular one probably existed before but this was the first time it bit me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Changing Your Delphi License Serial Number by Deltics</title>
		<link>http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog/?p=1425&#038;cpage=1#comment-14047</link>
		<dc:creator>Deltics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 03:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog/?p=1425#comment-14047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like one for the &quot;to watch&quot; list.   :) 

And thanks :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like one for the &#8220;to watch&#8221; list.   <img src='http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>And thanks <img src='http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
